On Tuesday, May 12, 2026, CNN aired Anderson Cooperâs first sit-down with Brian Driscoll Jr. since the FBI fired him last August. Driscoll â known inside the bureau as âDrizzâ â is suing Kash Patel, Attorney General Pam Bondi, and the Trump administration for wrongful termination. The lawsuit, Driscoll v. Patel, is pending in federal court in Washington. The Justice Department has moved to dismiss. The CNN piece gave Driscoll a microphone to lay out, in his own words, what he says happened inside the FBI in the opening weeks of Trumpâs second term. The short version: a White House-directed purge of agents who had worked on the January 6 prosecutions and the Mar-a-Lago classified documents case, run through Patel, with Patel allegedly telling Driscoll outright that his own job depended on getting it done. The long version is worse. Driscoll wasnât supposed to be acting FBI director. A clerical error did it. According to reporting from earlier in 2025, the incoming Trump team had planned to install Robert Kissane â Driscollâs friend and colleague, as the acting chief, replacing Christopher Wray. But somebody typed Driscollâs name into the press announcement instead, with Kissane listed as his deputy. Nobody bothered to fix it. It was the kind of bureaucratic accident that, in a normal administration, would have been a footnote. Instead, it dropped a 45-year-old career agent into the eye of a hurricane. Driscollâs rĂ©sumĂ© is the kind that makes the âdeep stateâ framing collapse on contact: 18 years at the bureau. FBI Medal of Valor and Shield of Bravery. Commander of the Hostage Rescue Team â the tip of the spear, the unit that handles nuclear-device scenarios and hostage takedowns. One of the gunmen on the 2013 rescue of a five-year-old kidnapped off a school bus in Alabama (later dramatized on a CBS show). Collected evidence in Syria during the operation in which Delta Force killed an ISIS leader and recovered material connected to the captivity of American hostage Kayla Mueller. Most recently, head of the Newark Field Office. Heâs a 9/11-generation New Yorker who, by his own telling, joined the bureau because of the towers. Not a partisan. Not an activist. A copâs cop. Thatâs the guy the Trump transition team called a week before the inauguration with an offer. Driscoll told Cooper he was offered the No. 2 job at the FBI with a warning: if he didnât take it, a political appointee would. He hesitantly agreed. Then came the vetting. According to Driscoll, the incoming Trump officials wanted to know: Who he voted for. Whether heâd voted for a Democrat in recent elections. When, exactly, he âstarted supporting Trump.â Patel himself, Driscoll says, told him the vetting would not be a problem so long as he wasnât active on social media, didnât donate to Democrats, and hadnât voted for Kamala Harris in 2024. âIt made the hair on the back of my neck stand up,â Driscoll told CNN. The lawsuit fills in more. The vetting interview was conducted by Paul Ingrassia â a 28-year-old right-wing blogger who had previously represented accused sex trafficker Andrew Tate (despite Ingrassia not being admitted to the bar until 2024). Ingrassia was later nominated by Trump to run the Office of Special Counsel. His confirmation collapsed in July 2025 after his long, documented association with neo-Nazis became impossible to ignore on Capitol Hill. According to the complaint, Ingrassia asked Driscoll how he had voted in the last five elections, what he thought of the agents who searched Mar-a-Lago, and his views on DEI. Driscoll refused to answer. Driscoll then learned from Emil Bove â Trumpâs former criminal defense lawyer, by then acting deputy attorney general â that he had âfailedâ the vetting interview for being insufficiently âbased.â He got the job anyway. This is the moment that turned Driscoll into a folk hero inside the bureau. After Trump pardoned roughly 1,600 January 6 defendants on Inauguration Day, the Justice Department, via Bove, demanded that the FBI produce a list of every agent and employee who had worked on the January 6 investigations. The number ran to roughly 6,000 people â out of an FBI workforce of about 38,000. Driscoll asked Bove why he wanted it. The answer, according to Driscoll, was that there was âcultural rot in the FBI.â Driscoll says he told Bove this was wrong. The lawsuit alleges Bove also told him that the panic and anxiety the demand was creating in the workforce âwas the intent.â Bove cited pressure from White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller, who, the suit says, wanted to see FBI firings on the scale of the DOJ purge already underway, where more than a dozen career prosecutors who had worked with former special counsel Jack Smith on the Trump cases had been fired. Bove then handed Driscoll a list of eight senior field leaders and executive assistant directors to fire â people who had worked on January 6 cases, several of them within striking distance of retirement. Driscoll says he pleaded with Bove to let them reach retirement so their pensions would remain intact. The termination memo that came back said: retire by this date, or be fired. Then Driscoll did something unusual for a man in a federal bureaucracy. He sent a bureau-wide email â to all 38,000 employees â informing them of Boveâs request. He instructed that the list of names be compiled using employee ID numbers rather than names, following credible reports that the list might be made public. (A temporary restraining order was filed by an FBI employeesâ group within days to block any public release.) He added that he would put his own name on it: he had personally arrested a January 6 defendant in New York, a man whose apartment yielded multiple weapons and thousands of rounds of ammunition. âAs weâve said since the moment we agreed to take on these roles, we are going to follow the law, follow FBI policy, and do whatâs in the best interest of the workforce and the American people â always.â Bove fired back a memo accusing Driscoll of âinsubordination.â Inside the bureau, the response was the opposite. Agents made memes: âSaint Driz.â âWhat Would Drizz Do?â Someone cut a video of Driscoll as Batman from The Dark Knight Rises, fighting off DOGE. He had been in the chair for about a month. Kash Patel was confirmed FBI director on February 20, 2025, in a 51â49 vote â every Democrat opposed, plus Republicans Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski. At his confirmation hearings he had been categorical: âI have no interest, no desire and will not, if confirmed, go backwards. There will be no politicization at the FBI. There will be no retributive actions taken by any FBI, should I be confirmed.â âNo one will be terminated for case assignments.â Driscoll says the version of Patel he met privately, after confirmation, was a different man. In a meeting in Patelâs office, Patel allegedly told him: âThe FBI tried to put the president in jail and he hasnât forgotten it.â And the corollary, according to the complaint: Patelâs own job depended on removing the agents who had worked on cases against Trump. Driscoll says Patel told him, in essence, that he understood the summary firings were âlikely illegalâ and that he could be sued and deposed â but that he had no choice, because his bosses had given him the directive. This is the central allegation of the lawsuit, and the reason it has drawn an unusually heavy legal team: Mark Zaid and Brad Moss (whistleblower veterans who have represented everyone from Alexander Vindman to Mickey Dolenz), Abbe Lowell (one of the most prominent defense attorneys in Washington), and Chris Mattei (who represented the Sandy Hook families against Alex Jones). If even half of what the complaint alleges is true, the FBI director knowingly violated the constitutional rights of senior subordinates because the alternative was losing his own job. The DOJ has moved to dismiss. Plaintiffsâ response was due February 13, 2026; the governmentâs reply wasâŠ
Send this story to anyone â or drop the embed into a blog post, Substack, Notion page. Every play sends rev-share back to Dean Blundell.
Loading comments...