Welcome to Storyflo Daily Science. I'm Sam.
The most consequential story today is one about scientific integrity. STAT reports that former Stanford President Marc Tessier-Lavigne broke his silence publicly for the first time about allegations in Theo Baker's new book, "How to Rule the World," that he was forced to resign not just over flawed oversight of his lab but over how he handled the misconduct controversy itself. STAT's Matthew Herper read three paragraphs from the book aloud at the Breakthrough Summit West, and Tessier-Lavigne responded directly. The reason this matters beyond Stanford gossip is that the case sits at the center of a broader argument about whether senior PIs should be held accountable for irreproducibility in papers they co-author. Tessier-Lavigne's response will be read closely by every research-integrity committee in the country. STAT's coverage is the place to follow it.
The story I'd put second is a public-health legal challenge. Inside Medicine is breaking that an MV Hondius cruise-ship passenger now being held at the National Quarantine Unit in Omaha intends to legally challenge her quarantine order. The passengers were exposed to Andes hantavirus and repatriated to the US. The constitutional question — under what conditions can federal authorities hold someone against their will for an infectious-disease exposure when test sensitivity for the specific strain is uncertain — is exactly the kind of case that sets precedent for the next outbreak. Andes virus has a roughly 30-40% case-fatality rate in confirmed pulmonary cases. The legal challenge and the public-health stakes are running on the same clock.
A separate piece I want to surface is from Our Public Lands & Waters, reporting that Steve Pearce is now officially confirmed as Director of the Bureau of Land Management. The publication documents that even before confirmation, BLM had transferred 1.4 million acres to Alaska, loosened grazing rules, removed bison from federal lands in Montana, and rescinded the Public Lands Rule which had elevated conservation to equal footing with extraction. The science angle is that long-term ecological monitoring datasets — the kind that take decades to build — depend on stable land-management policy. Rule changes at this pace risk breaking the continuity of those datasets.
A more personal piece worth surfacing: Unbiased Science's Andrea Love published a reflection on speaking at a major science-communication event, framing the work of public scientific communication as "running toward the burning building." The post is short, but the framing — that the next decade of science depends on more researchers being willing to engage public-facing platforms — is one I think about a lot.
The open question: will the Tessier-Lavigne response shift institutional norms about co-author accountability, or does it stay a Stanford-specific story? Watch the next few weeks of editor commentary in Nature and Science.
That's your Storyflo Daily Science. Sources in the show notes. Sam out.
Send this story to anyone — or drop the embed into a blog post, Substack, Notion page. Every play sends rev-share back to Storyflo Daily.
We’ve simplified responses to 👍 / 👎. Past comments are archived but no longer visible.
